Billion BiPAC 8800AXL R2 - What An Improvement
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:59 am
- Location: Newton Poppleford, Devon, UK
- Contact:
Re: Billion BiPAC 8800AXL R2 - What An Improvement
Yeah, it's set to 100%. We've bought a repeater because even with previous devices, some parts of the house couldn't get a decent signal anyway.
William Grimsley.
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:59 am
- Location: Newton Poppleford, Devon, UK
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:30 pm
Re: Billion BiPAC 8800AXL R2 - What An Improvement
Grimers wrote:What chipset does this have?
BCM63167
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:59 am
- Location: Newton Poppleford, Devon, UK
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:59 am
- Location: Newton Poppleford, Devon, UK
- Contact:
Re: Billion BiPAC 8800AXL R2 - What An Improvement
Hi billion_fan,
The upstream ES and now SES counters on both downstream and upstream are broken. The upstream ES counter seems to go up even when there's nothing to cause it and sometimes (on both downstream and upstream) when there's only a few CRC's (say 2) in an ES, it reports it as a SES (AFAIK, 9 + CRC's make an SES). Also, sometimes when there are more than 9 CRC's in an ES (in this example 12) it just reports it as an ES not SES.
I hope I've explained it ok, as I've noticed I've mentioned "ES" and "SES" several times in the previous paragraph.
Here's a screenshot from the telnet interface:

Thanks!
The upstream ES and now SES counters on both downstream and upstream are broken. The upstream ES counter seems to go up even when there's nothing to cause it and sometimes (on both downstream and upstream) when there's only a few CRC's (say 2) in an ES, it reports it as a SES (AFAIK, 9 + CRC's make an SES). Also, sometimes when there are more than 9 CRC's in an ES (in this example 12) it just reports it as an ES not SES.
I hope I've explained it ok, as I've noticed I've mentioned "ES" and "SES" several times in the previous paragraph.

Here's a screenshot from the telnet interface:

Thanks!
William Grimsley.
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:30 pm
Re: Billion BiPAC 8800AXL R2 - What An Improvement
I'll check with our engineersGrimers wrote:Hi billion_fan,
The upstream ES and now SES counters on both downstream and upstream are broken. The upstream ES counter seems to go up even when there's nothing to cause it and sometimes (on both downstream and upstream) when there's only a few CRC's (say 2) in an ES, it reports it as a SES (AFAIK, 9 + CRC's make an SES). Also, sometimes when there are more than 9 CRC's in an ES (in this example 12) it just reports it as an ES not SES.
I hope I've explained it ok, as I've noticed I've mentioned "ES" and "SES" several times in the previous paragraph.![]()
Here's a screenshot from the telnet interface:
Thanks!
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:30 pm
Re: Billion BiPAC 8800AXL R2 - What An Improvement
What is the quality of your line like?? Do you experience any drop outs??billion_fan wrote:I'll check with our engineersGrimers wrote:Hi billion_fan,
The upstream ES and now SES counters on both downstream and upstream are broken. The upstream ES counter seems to go up even when there's nothing to cause it and sometimes (on both downstream and upstream) when there's only a few CRC's (say 2) in an ES, it reports it as a SES (AFAIK, 9 + CRC's make an SES). Also, sometimes when there are more than 9 CRC's in an ES (in this example 12) it just reports it as an ES not SES.
I hope I've explained it ok, as I've noticed I've mentioned "ES" and "SES" several times in the previous paragraph.![]()
Here's a screenshot from the telnet interface:
Thanks!
Can you post a screen capture of your xDSL page.
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:59 am
- Location: Newton Poppleford, Devon, UK
- Contact:
Re: Billion BiPAC 8800AXL R2 - What An Improvement
It's not brilliant. It experiences errors but doesn't drop out from noise.
xDSL
Mode VDSL2
Traffic Type PTM
Status Up
Link Power State L0
Downstream Upstream
Line Coding (Trellis) On On
SNR Margin (dB) 3.7 5.8
Attenuation (dB) 26.6 0.0
Output Power (dBm) 12.0 6.3
Attainable Rate (Kbps) 54783 7161
Rate (Kbps) 53192 7879
B (# of bytes in Mux Data Frame) 227 239
M (# of Mux Data Frames in an RS codeword) 1 1
T (# of Mux Data Frames in an OH sub-frame) 0 41
R (# of redundancy bytes in the RS codeword) 10 0
S (# of data symbols over which the RS code word spans) 0.1363 0.9677
L (# of bits transmitted in each data symbol) 13966 1984
D (interleaver depth) 4 1
I (interleaver block size in bytes) 238 120
N (RS codeword size) 238 240
Delay (msec) 0 0
INP (DMT symbol) 56.00 0.00
OH Frames 0 0
OH Frame Errors 116 832
RS Words 4178353844 3020831621
RS Correctable Errors 189023956 0
RS Uncorrectable Errors 0 0
HEC Errors 0 0
OCD Errors 0 0
LCD Errors 0 0
Total Cells 1704377419 0
Data Cells 1442959220 0
Bit Errors 0 0
Total ES 10 712
Total SES 4 2
Total UAS 126 126
xDSL
Mode VDSL2
Traffic Type PTM
Status Up
Link Power State L0
Downstream Upstream
Line Coding (Trellis) On On
SNR Margin (dB) 3.7 5.8
Attenuation (dB) 26.6 0.0
Output Power (dBm) 12.0 6.3
Attainable Rate (Kbps) 54783 7161
Rate (Kbps) 53192 7879
B (# of bytes in Mux Data Frame) 227 239
M (# of Mux Data Frames in an RS codeword) 1 1
T (# of Mux Data Frames in an OH sub-frame) 0 41
R (# of redundancy bytes in the RS codeword) 10 0
S (# of data symbols over which the RS code word spans) 0.1363 0.9677
L (# of bits transmitted in each data symbol) 13966 1984
D (interleaver depth) 4 1
I (interleaver block size in bytes) 238 120
N (RS codeword size) 238 240
Delay (msec) 0 0
INP (DMT symbol) 56.00 0.00
OH Frames 0 0
OH Frame Errors 116 832
RS Words 4178353844 3020831621
RS Correctable Errors 189023956 0
RS Uncorrectable Errors 0 0
HEC Errors 0 0
OCD Errors 0 0
LCD Errors 0 0
Total Cells 1704377419 0
Data Cells 1442959220 0
Bit Errors 0 0
Total ES 10 712
Total SES 4 2
Total UAS 126 126
William Grimsley.
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 4:30 pm
Re: Billion BiPAC 8800AXL R2 - What An Improvement
Thanks for that, I'll check with our engineers and get back to youGrimers wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2017 7:52 pm It's not brilliant. It experiences errors but doesn't drop out from noise.
xDSL
Mode VDSL2
Traffic Type PTM
Status Up
Link Power State L0
Downstream Upstream
Line Coding (Trellis) On On
SNR Margin (dB) 3.7 5.8
Attenuation (dB) 26.6 0.0
Output Power (dBm) 12.0 6.3
Attainable Rate (Kbps) 54783 7161
Rate (Kbps) 53192 7879
B (# of bytes in Mux Data Frame) 227 239
M (# of Mux Data Frames in an RS codeword) 1 1
T (# of Mux Data Frames in an OH sub-frame) 0 41
R (# of redundancy bytes in the RS codeword) 10 0
S (# of data symbols over which the RS code word spans) 0.1363 0.9677
L (# of bits transmitted in each data symbol) 13966 1984
D (interleaver depth) 4 1
I (interleaver block size in bytes) 238 120
N (RS codeword size) 238 240
Delay (msec) 0 0
INP (DMT symbol) 56.00 0.00
OH Frames 0 0
OH Frame Errors 116 832
RS Words 4178353844 3020831621
RS Correctable Errors 189023956 0
RS Uncorrectable Errors 0 0
HEC Errors 0 0
OCD Errors 0 0
LCD Errors 0 0
Total Cells 1704377419 0
Data Cells 1442959220 0
Bit Errors 0 0
Total ES 10 712
Total SES 4 2
Total UAS 126 126
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:59 am
- Location: Newton Poppleford, Devon, UK
- Contact:
Re: Billion BiPAC 8800AXL R2 - What An Improvement
Hi! Any update on this? Random upstream ES keep appearing out of nowhere e.g. just had 3 ES/2 CRC's in a minute. It doesn't match. The only thing I can think of is if the CRC occured over the boundary of 2 seconds, but I thought this was impossible?! The device is running the 2.52.d5 firmware.
William Grimsley.